Skip to main content

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Review

First things first, I have read and re-read all the Harry Potter books ever since they were written and almost know them by-heart! :P I have seen only the first movie of the series and after being terribly disappointed didn't feel the need/urge to go for any other after... There. Now having said this, this movie was really good.

So for starters, I had issues with the book. The 7th book was the most disappointing in which I felt like there was no reason or purpose behind all the killing. Yes, she did tie most (or actually all) loose ends, but it seemed like she did it because she didn't know what else to do. I read that book in about 3 hours and for me the book really needs to grip you, like you shouldn't want to put it down, it should engulf you... but the fact that the book didn't manage to grip me till the last chapter or so when the story actually begins to unravel is pathetic... anyways.

The movie is based on the book (duh!) So I pretty much knew the story well so I'm not about to dwell a lot on that, but instead am going to talk about how the movie was made! :) The director is awesome and so is the cinematographer! Some of the shots were beautiful! Almost like LOTR! :P I loved how they made the movie really dark, gripping, and crisp in a lot of ways. They tied in things very well. Like the point where Hermoine tells Harry about why the Griffindor sword will destroy the Horcrux, she shows him a line which says that the sword will absorb anything that will make it stronger. And since Harry had used that sword on the Basilisk in the Chamber of Secrets, the sword absorbed the Basilisk venom and could hence kill the Horcrux. And I thought that this was something that wasn't there in the book? Am not sure about that one, but it was an interesting way to put things. Then there was this shot when Hermoine is roaming in the forest under the protective spells which she's cast, and then she comes across these Snatchers. Because of the spell she can't be seen by them, and I thought it was really good acting because in spite of the fact that there were facing each other with barely an inch apart, and even though he couldn't see her, he could smell and hear her, so she'd held her breath while he was standing there sniffing... that moment was so beautifully depicted!

One of the best scenes in the movie was the depiction of the story of the deathly hallows when Hermoine was reading it. It was completely done with CG and the creativity was mindblowing! I wish someone made a clip of it and shared it on youtube or something because it was awesome. Very 300 kind of blood splattering, and just amazing graphics!!

As far as the acting goes, it was all about Harry, Ron and Hermoine. But I think Ron and Hermoine did a better job than Harry. For some weird reason I kept thinking that Daniel's proportions are all wrong. In the first scene when these people come to take the Polyjuice potion and become 7 Harry's, when Hermoine and Fleur turn into Harry, it looks odd because it's a boy wearing girl's clothes, but since that point, it just kind of stayed with me, that his head is not proportionate to his body. It's like his head is too big for his body. Something was weird. I don't know what... :P

Emma Watson was really good. Really strong and real portrayal of Hermoine. Rupert (whatever) was great as well. Very convincing. I think like Harry's character in the book, even in the movie, it looked like Harry didn't have a backbone in his spine. I felt the end was too bad though. Yes I know it was meant to be. But even then! :)

All in all definitely a movie you should watch. It would've been better in 3D or at least in like High Definition. Maybe the theatre I went to wasn't great. But I felt the movie video quality could've been better, more crisp, more contrast, more detail.

So go on and have fun!

Comments

nikunj said…
the movie was great...i agree...completely the director's baby...and yes, the deathly hallows bit was nothing short of brilliance...but the sword bit is exactly like that in the book as well...so i wouldn't give them credit for that...also, besides ron (who i think was brilliant) and hermione everybody else's acting was bordering on bad...all the small little characters like the minister of magic, X Lovegood (luna's father), even Voldemort was not upto mark in this movie...his appearance in the first scene hardly elicited fear (which he managed to extract in the other movies) and Daniel is not even worth mentioning...considering he is the central character, his acting was pathetic...but the movie did justice to the book and that's why i say it is completely a director's and cinematographer's baby...
~ a said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
~ a said…
the sword thing was there then... :) i just didn't recall at all!

but yeah Voldemort was not at all scary. In fact his eyes were too human. They should've been more snakelike. the minister of magic, wasn't he supposed to look like a lion? he looked like anything but that! hmm... i think i agree with all ur points actually! :P

Popular posts from this blog

Shaitan

So thanks to some prodding from my friend Shri, I decided to go watch this movie today. I'm not upset I did, but I'm certainly not happy. It was sort of like watching Love, Sex aur Dhokha in a way. Graphic, very close to reality, and loud. The movie begins with Anurag Kashyap saying that it's a just a movie and that he doesn't support the use of drugs, drinking and driving and that it's a fictional story which is debatable because like Dev D he used an actual incident as one of the pivotal moments in the movie, in this case the moment is when 5 kids high on coke, drinks, and generally on life, speed across town and in one of the turns end up killing two people who were on a scooter. They were driving a Hummer. Anyways, to come back to the timeline of things, the movie begins by shocking you. I know I've watched a number of movies which involve sequences of kisses in front of my parents / relatives without flinching. But I would not be able to watch this movi

Karthik Calling Karthik

After having been completely enamored and in love with the song "Uff Teri Adaa" I couldn't wait to watch the movie finally. The end emotion being, a decent watch, but could've been much better. The movie begins with a very stereotypical life of a guy (Farhaan) who's just not got anything going for him, from a landlord who's hounding him for money, to a boss who's blaming him for everything that goes wrong, to the hot co-worker (Deepika) who just doesn't know of his existence at all! The change that comes into his life, is a call, at 5 am each day, by a man who claims to be "Karthik" himself who guides him to becoming the man that he is. And voila, suddenly, the real "Karthik" begins to stand up for himself, asserts himself in front of his boss, and manages to strike conversation (a rather witty one) with Deepika too! Sitting in the audience, you literally feel like whistling and hooting when you see him walk down the corridor of his

Hum Tum aur Ghost Review!

There are some movies where you should just choose to leave your head behind and see only the movie. This movie, Hum Tum aur Ghost, is somewhat similar. The plot is fairly simple, you have Arshad Warsi, playing Armaan, a fashion photographer who's a heavy drinker, assisted by a gorgeous Sandhya Mridul, playing Mini, in love with Dia Mirza, playing Ghehna, who's supposed to be the editor of Cosmopolitan (and is not seen under pressure, is not hyper fashion conscious, or busy at all!). That said, you have an entire entourage of "ghosts" who are following Armaan, because he has the "gift" to see, and hear them. Similar to the Sixth Sense, each of them have died having something unfinished and need help from him to complete that deed so that they can move on to heaven... It's interspersed with some comic dialogues, and some great acting esp. by Boman Irani, and Sandhya Mridul. Arshad Warsi fails to evoke the right sentiment of pity, warmth, and affection in